This is the important part to note: As stated, we're using a 1080 FTW explicitly to draw-out the limits of the CPUs and see where each chokes as we go further down the stack. This chart shows the devices with the i5-6600K as a baseline of 100% performance. Let's look at the scaling of all these devices in percentage form for a moment. Although there's a clear choke point in these CPUs when running on a high-end GPU, one useful thing we can learn is that the X4 845 would perform close enough to the 880K that the price difference could be enough to encourage 845 pickups over the 880K. Next, the Athlon X4 845 runs at 63FPS AVG, just a few frames behind where the 880K would be. If that CPU interests you or is yours, you could compare it reasonably to the 7870K. The A10-7870K follows this, but note that the 7870K is effectively identical to the Athlon X4 880K.
The FX-8370 is about 65FPS behind the 6700K, trailed next by the power-saving 8320E - as designated by its E suffix - at 77FPS AVG. The 6300's higher frequency is assisting the processor in keeping up with the i5-6400 in low values.ĪVG FPS is fairly tightly timed on all these devices, but that has a lot to do with the GPU itself still, the FX-8370 does well to keep its low framerates within reasonable range of its average, keeping tighter frametimes than the i5-6400.
Battlefield 1 directx 12 vs 11 full#
Moving down the list, the i5-6400 CPU at 2.7GHz is starting to show a frequency advantage to the 6600K, with a performance disparity of nearly 20FPS between the 6600K and the 6400 i5 CPUs.įinally, we're met with the i3-6300 at 111FPS, now a full 44FPS behind the flagship Skylake CPU, and the FX-8370 at 90FPS AVG. The 6600K's performance trails the 6700K with hyperthreading by about 10%. This is where we see CPUs beginning to limit the GTX 1080 FTW Hybrid we selected, intentionally used to demonstrate exactly this type of performance scaling. Moving down the line, the more mainstream i5-6600K at stock speeds is achieving a 140FPS AVG, landing it about 15FPS behind the hyperthreaded 6700K. This isn't that significant in terms of visible framerate you'll still experience the game more or less the same way, but hyperthreading is clearly beneficial to low values in this test scenario.
Interestingly, disabling hyperthreading results in a reduction in average FPS of about 4%, down to nearly 149FPS, but our lows take the biggest hit - they're now 95 and 80FPS. There's not a huge gap here, and a good amount of that is because of the stock 6700K's increased clock frequency over the stock 5930K. The 6700K with hyperthreading enabled is next in line at 155FPS AVG, with 1% lows of 111 and 0.1% lows of 96. The i7-5930K at stock frequencies hit a framerate of about 158FPS AVG, with lows well above 100FPS. We're starting with DirectX 11 - Dx12 will come next. Battlefield 1 CPU Benchmark - DirectX 11 (i7-6700K vs.
0 kommentar(er)
